Difference between revisions of "CS-US Interval"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(created page) |
(Fix PubMed links) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Exceptions to this rule: | Exceptions to this rule: | ||
| − | KAMIN LJ.Traumatic avoidance learning: the effects of CS-US interval with a trace-conditioning procedure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Feb;47(1):65-72. PMID: | + | KAMIN LJ.Traumatic avoidance learning: the effects of CS-US interval with a trace-conditioning procedure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Feb;47(1):65-72. PMID 13130735 |
| + | |||
| + | CHURCH RM, BRUSH FR, SOLOMON RL.Traumatic avoidance learning; the effects of CS-US interval with a delayed-conditioning procedure in a free-responding situation.J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Jun;49(3):301-8. PMID 13332132 | ||
| − | + | BRUSH FR, BRUSH ES, SOLOMON RL. Traumatic avoidance learning: the effects of CS-US interval with a delayed-conditioning procedure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Aug;48(4):285-93. PMID 13252159 | |
| − | + | [[Category:Taste Aversion]] | |
Latest revision as of 11:24, 7 April 2015
"The most typical finding has been that the optimal interval is in the quarter-second range on either side of .5 seconds"
Exceptions to this rule:
KAMIN LJ.Traumatic avoidance learning: the effects of CS-US interval with a trace-conditioning procedure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Feb;47(1):65-72. PMID 13130735
CHURCH RM, BRUSH FR, SOLOMON RL.Traumatic avoidance learning; the effects of CS-US interval with a delayed-conditioning procedure in a free-responding situation.J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Jun;49(3):301-8. PMID 13332132
BRUSH FR, BRUSH ES, SOLOMON RL. Traumatic avoidance learning: the effects of CS-US interval with a delayed-conditioning procedure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Aug;48(4):285-93. PMID 13252159